InterNesting video. Arbi-triDelic. My views are Integrative Andish. There is evolution, and there is periodic interjection of intelligent design from both higher spirited intelligences, and technological intelligences. Most of the polarizing debates I get suckjacked into never get beyond the Either This or That reactational "Nor Nogginism". We need more of that OutTelligence relevance to the groovidance. Building concepts out of eclecticism is what I do. Wordsmithing is what I woo as a sideline to psychedelicize me mediums. Synchopation nation is the equation for relation of the doda doda doda dodeca das.

Protein is never a problem, as long as one is getting sufficient calories (not effectively anorexic or starving) .... as even plain, ordinary fruits and vegetables have ample protein (6-12% of calories) similar to mother's milk (also 6-12% of calories). The 'perceived' need for Excessive amounts of protein is due to a lifetime of conditioning. We are fed at least from 3-6 times (or more) the amount of protein we actually need from an early age. This causes fast growth, but cuts lifespan down considerably. All that excess protein has to be eliminated, and minerals to buffer the acidic protein's excretion through the kidneys (as blood PH has to be kept at a level that is alkaline) is the real cause of osteoporosis. The metabolism of everyone who hasn't detoxed is Geared towards this elimination, so if you stop eating all that excess, you fell somewhat starved.... as proteins will continue to be eliminated until your metabolism cycles readjust. There are other complex factors involved as well.

hey DMX
i commend you for sticking with your original quest, in the face of more sparring between these peaceful vegans.
It can take some time to get used to living with less protein intake, but rest assured, we don't need nearly as much protein as the average human consumes. We don't even need as much as the USDA recommends--now THAT (IMO) is Bunk Science. it's also called Blind Tradition, maintaining guidelines that were set back when people thought they knew what the human body thrives on, and no one has ever challenged it. I hope that someone gets it together to start conducting legitimate, extensive studies on people who eat exclusively raw diets. If i were you, Sentience, that is something i would try my best to initiate. I don't know what it takes to get studies ordered, but perhaps you do. I have a long list of dietary studies i would order if i were in a position to do so.

As for information on what is wrong with cooked food, it's all over the internet. Just search "benefits of raw diet", pick up a book by Gabriel Cousens or David Wolfe, or any one of the raw food gurus. We were not intended to eat our food cooked. It didn't grow that way, especially grains which require extensive processing to make them palatable, and our bodies have had to adapt in order to figure out how to process foods so far from their natural state. These adaptations have eventually resulted in disease, which is seen as part of life by most physicians. it's not true that disease is a natural part of life, there has just never been any evidence shown to counteract that. We need tens of thousands of raw foodists to survive a massive epidemic or live to be 120 years old before anyone will believe that we're right.

this: >>the term organic denotes more specificity to: living (life essence and integrities intact) and raw (if not fully alive, then still possessing chemistries that readily translate into life without need for breaking down and reassembly to eliminate toxic or non-functional chemistries.<<
is a key statement. It points to the nature of the ongoing disagreement between Sentience and Leslie. Sentience is a conventional scientist, Leslie is more of an alchemist. It's like comparing Astronomy to Astrology. You're talking about the same stars in the same system, but with different qualities. Astronomy says that Astrology is bunk science, can't be proven, is mere legend or illusion. Astrology does not deny Astronomy its truth, however, recognizes the limitations of viewing an evolving, organic, dynamic system through the lens of a fixed and sterile point of view.

My point is that Astronomy and Astrology used to be one science, before the Powers that Be (the Church at that time) stepped in and declared Astrology a heretical occult science that must be stopped and its proponents silenced. This is the same hand of Big Brother that wants to mandate that our greens and nuts all be irradiated, that wants to regulate herbal supplements and lie about what goes into producing dairy products. The alliance of Big Brother and modern science is unfortunate, because the diagnostic techniques and exploratory methods could be put to good use in actually making people healthier than ever before. Instead, they are used to justify old paradigms of treating disease. Because of this, my allegiance lies with Alchemy, as it considers the divine qualities of life and the elements that have always existed on this planet and beyond. I am also an Astrologer, who began as an Astronomer and then had a spiritual awakening atop a Mayan Pyramid in 1986. I often feel as if i'm still standing on top of that pyramid, looking out at the entire world and across the fabric of time.

To break it down more simply, what you put into your body is what you will get out of it. Put in life, and you will live. Put in death, and you will die. Of course, we will all die someday, but once you start transforming your world into one of light and life, you begin to notice that most people on earth are in the process of dying, right before your eyes. The good news is that we have a choice; to become one of the living, or one of the walking dead.

m7